Factors Associated with Treatment Success After Interlaminar Epidural Steroid Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain.

AIM: To investigate the demographic, clinical and radiological findings associated with treatment success after interlaminar epidural steroid injection (ILESI) in radicular pain induced by cervical disc herniation. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this retrospective study, the data of patients who received cervical ILESI between January 2017 and June 2021 were screened. Of 223 patients, 92 with unilateral radicular neck pain due to cervical disc herniation were included. Demographic data, symptom duration, and numerical rating scale scores at baseline, at three weeks, three months, and six months after treatment were collected from the medical records of the patients. Disc herniation level, cervical axis, disc height, presence and degree of spinal canal and neural foraminal stenosis, vertebral endplate signal change, and definitive presence of uncovertebral and facet osteoarthritis were evaluated using cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging. Treatment success was determined as ?50% reduction in pain scores at six months compared to baseline. RESULTS: Data of 92 patients (27 men, 65 women) were included. The mean age was 50.82 ± 10.22 years, and the median symptom duration was 12 (4.25 to 20) months. At six months after ILESI, treatment was successful in 58 (58.7%) patients and unsuccessful in 34 (41.3%) patients. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the factors associated with treatment success at six months post-injection. In the final model, neural foraminal stenosis (non-severe vs. severe) and spinal canal stenosis (non-severe vs. severe) were significantly associated with the treatment success (OR=3.02, 95% CI=1.40?10.95, p=0.009; OR=5.31, 95% CI=1.77?15.85, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: Treatment success of cervical ILESI at six months is favorable. However, the presence of severe neural foraminal and spinal canal stenosis is associated with a reduced likelihood of treatment success.

Effect of perioperative intravenous magnesium sulfate on postoperative pain after iliac venous stenting.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the effect of perioperative intravenous (IV) magnesium sulfate (MS) on low back pain (LBP) severity after iliac venous stent implantation. METHODS: The present study was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 97 patients who had undergone iliac venous stenting for post-thrombotic syndrome between January 1, 2019 and January 11, 2021 were considered for inclusion in the present study. The patients were divided into two groups: those who had received perioperative MS infusions (group M) and those who had not (control group; group C). Group M was given an IV bolus of 20 mg/kg before anesthesia induction and an IV MS infusion of 20 mg/kg/h during the procedure. Postoperative LBP severity was evaluated using the numerical rating scale at 1, 6, 12, and 24 hours after the procedure. The total tramadol consumption within 24 hours was measured with the help of a patient-controlled analgesia device. Moreover, additional analgesic needs and complaints of nausea and vomiting were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients were considered for inclusion in the present study. Of the 97 patients, 29 were excluded because of a lack of follow-up data, leaving 68 patients for the final analysis (group M, n = 36; group C, n = 32). The demographic data, body mass index, sedation time, procedure time, and stented side data were similar between the two groups (P > .05). The rates of atropine and ephedrine use during the procedure were similar between the two groups (P > .05). The numerical rating scale scores were significantly lower for group M at all follow-up periods (P < .001). The total tramadol consumption at 24 hours postoperatively was 191.94 ± 68.194 mg for group M and 378.75 ± 31.367 mg for group C (P < .001). Additional analgesics were used by 8 patients (22.2%) in group M and 17 patients (53.1%) in group C. Additional analgesic needs were significantly lower for group M (P = .008). Nausea and vomiting were observed in six (19.4%) and four (11.1%) patients in group M and eight (32%) and five (15.6%) patients in group C, respectively (P > .05). CONCLUSIONS: For patients undergoing iliac venous stenting, perioperative MS infusion was an effective and safe treatment option that reduced LBP severity, opioid consumption, and the need for additional analgesics in the acute postoperative period.

Predictive factors affecting treatment success in ganglion impar block applied in chronic coccygodynia.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the predictive factors affecting the success of ganglion impar block applied in chronic coccygodynia. METHODS: Patients who received ganglion impar block to treat coccygodynia between January 1, 2018 and January 1, 2021 were retrospectively screened. Of the 195 patients, 102 met the final analysis criteria and were included in the study. Demographic data, coccygodynia etiology, coccygodynia symptom duration, history of coccyx fracture, regular opioid use, and presence of other musculoskeletal chronic pain conditions accompanying coccygodynia were obtained from patient records. In addition, coccyx radiography was examined, and coccyx curvature type, permanent subluxation, and posterior spicule presence were evaluated. The criterion for treatment success was set as ≥50% reduction in Numerical Rating Scale pain scores in the third month after treatment. RESULTS: Treatment was successful of the patients in 69.6% (95% CI 60.4% to 78.7%). A significant cut-off value (24.5 months) was determined for coccygodynia symptom duration using receiver operating characteristic analysis. Symptom duration above the cut-off value was defined as prolonged symptom duration. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to determine the predictive factors affecting treatment success in the third month after injection. In the final model, the presence of permanent subluxation (yes vs no), and the prolonged symptom duration (yes vs no) were found to have significant effects on treatment success (OR 9.56, 95% CI 1.44 to 63.40, p=0.02; OR 137.00, 95% CI 19.59 to 958.03, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Treatment success of ganglion impar block for coccygodynia is high. However, longer preprocedure symptom duration and the presence of permanent subluxation were associated with a decrease likelihood of treatment success.

COVID-19'da Ihmal Edilen Semptom: Agri.

Pain is a common but often ignored symptom in COVID-19 patients. Early and adequate treatment with detailed pain assessment in these patients may reduce the risk of pain chronicization, and mood dysregulation. To provide analgesia, paracetamol can be listed as the first option in these patients, and then NSAIDs can also be reliably used for pain management in patients with COVID-19 if there are no absolute contraindications such as kidney failure or gastric bleeding. Codeine is also a good alternative for patients with anxiety who do not respond to simple pain-relievers.

Pain Treatment Evaluation in COVID-19 Patients with Hesitant Fuzzy Linguistic Multicriteria Decision-Making.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has emerged as a worldwide pandemic since March 2020. Although most patients complain of moderate or severe pain, these symptoms are generally underestimated and appropriate treatment is not applied. This study aims to guide physicians in selecting and ranking various alternatives for the treatment of pain in COVID-19 patients. However, the choice of treatment for pain requires the consideration of many different conflicting criteria. Therefore, we have studied this problem as a multicriteria decision-making problem. Throughout the solution procedure, first, the criteria and subcriteria affecting the preferences are defined. Then, weight values are determined with respect to these criteria, as they have different degrees of importance for the problem. At this stage, hesitant fuzzy linguistic term sets (HFLTSs) are used, and thus, experts can convey their ideas more accurately. In this first phase of the study, an HFLTS integrated Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method is utilized. Subsequently, possible treatment alternatives are evaluated by using the Vise Kriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje (VIKOR) method. According to the results obtained by considering expert evaluations, the most preferred treatment is the administration of paracetamol, followed by interventional treatments, opioids, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), respectively. With this study, it is ensured that a more accurate method is followed by eliminating possible mistakes due to the subjective evaluations of experts in the process of determining pain treatment. This method can also be used in different patient and disease groups.

Greater occipital nerve block efficacy in COVID­19 associated headache: a preliminary study.

COVID­19 is an infection caused by the new coronavirus SARS­CoV­2. Headache is one of the most common neurological findings. In the treatment of various chronic headaches, the greater occipital nerve (GON) block is often used as a safe and effective method. The aim of our study was to investigate the effectiveness of the GON block in the treatment of headaches observed in COVID­19 patients. Between March and May 2020, 27 patients (with laboratory­confirmed 2019­nCoV infection by next­generation sequencing confirmation of real­time PCR) that had moderate or severe headache associated with COVID­19 and treated with a single session of GON block were retrospectively analyzed. The visual analogue scale (VAS) values and the number of analgesic usage of patients were recorded before and after the blockade on the 1st and 10th days. Fifteen (55.6%) patients included in the study were male and twelve (44.4%) were female. In terms of VAS values, the difference between pre­treatment and post­treatment values on the 1st and 10th days was found statistically significant. Likewise, the difference between analgesic use before and after the procedure was statistically significant. GON block appears to be an effective pain management method in COVID­19 related headache, and it revealed promising reductions in pain scores and analgesic usage. As well as we know, this is the first study of "COVID­19 associated headache treated with GON blockade". More long term and well­designed prospective studies with more participants are needed to better define this headache and develop effective treatment strategies.

Comparison of Ultrasonography and Conventional Fluoroscopy Guided Caudal Epidural Injection in Chronic Low Back Pain.

AIM: To compare the efficacies of fluoroscopy- and ultrasound (US)-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included patients with chronic LBP who underwent US- (Group U; n = 90) or fluoroscopyguided (Group F; n = 90) CESI. The procedure time, successful injection rate on the first attempt, complication rate, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score before CESI and after 3 weeks and 3 months of CESI were analyzed. RESULTS: NRS and ODI scores improved at 3 weeks (p < 0.001) and 3 months (p < 0.001) after CESIs. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for the NRS (p=0.22 and p=0.47) and ODI (p=0.58, p=0.22) scores. Moreover, the CESI procedure time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the successful injection rate on the first attempt was significantly higher (p=0.002) in Group U than in Group F. The complication rate difference was statistically insignificant between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of US-guided CESI were superior than those of fluoroscopy-guided CESI considering the successful injection rate on the first attempt and procedure time. In addition, US-guided CESI was as effective as fluoroscopy-guided CESI and did not expose patients and practitioners to radiation.

Analysis of anatomical localization and severity of injury in patients with blood transfusion in urban terrain hospital.

BACKGROUND: Blood loss is the most significant cause of mortality in trauma cases. In injured patients, rapid evaluation and appropriate transfusion is lifesaving. The present study aims to analyze the blood/blood products requirement based on available data and find any associations between the transfusion requirements and injury severity scores (ISS) and anatomical locations of injuries of transfused patients. METHODS: Between 30 July 2014 and 30 July 2016, casualties admitted to the urban terrain hospital (UTH) and transfused at least one unit of red blood cell (RBC) were included. UTH Transfusion Record Notebook data included patients' age, mechanism and anatomical location(s) of the injury, admission hemoglobin (g/dL) level, injury severity score (ISS), transfused units of erythrocyte suspension (ES), warm fresh whole blood (WFWB), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and massive transfusion (MT) rate. RESULTS: In this study, all patients were male; the mean age was 28.7±7.8 years. Overall, 59 of 579 (10%) patients were transfused 458 units of RBC (ES+WFWB). Torso (thorax ± abdomen) injury was present in 61% of the casualties who underwent transfusion, and 93% of these patients underwent massive transfusion. In 71% of patients, the ISS was >15, and there was statistically significant high blood/blood products use and MT rate in these patients, respectively (p=0.021, p=0.006). CONCLUSION: Anatomical location of injuries and ISS are valuable in the rapid determining of MT and survival rates of casualties. Especially in torso injuries, bleeding control is difficult and transfusion requirement and mortality rates are high. This study presents the trauma of urban terrain conflict-related transfusion data from a UTH.

Analgesic Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Pecs II Block in Central Venous Port Catheter Implantation.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: In oncology patients, central venous port catheter (CVPC) implantation is generally preferred for venous route. However, in this procedure, postoperative pain is often observed. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided Pecs II block in the management of pain after CVPC placement. METHODS: One hundred and eighty-seven patients who underwent CVPC implantation between January 2017 and August 2018 were included in the study. Patients who underwent Pecs II block under ultrasound guidance were called as the Pecs group, and those who underwent local anesthesia (LA) were referred as the LA group. All procedural parameters were analyzed, including demographic characteristics of patients, visual analogue scores (VAS) at 2nd and 24th hours, and postoperative opioid, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) consumption. RESULTS: The postoperative 2nd hour VAS scores were similar in both groups and were lower than the 24th hour VAS scores. VAS scores at the 24th hour in the Pecs group were significantly lower than the LA group (P = 0.001). While the number of fentanyl rescue doses administered in PACU was similar, the total NSAID consumption in the first 24 hours was higher in the LA group than in the Pecs group. CONCLUSION: In CVPC placement, ultrasound-guided Pecs II block is a more reliable, easily applicable and longer-acting approach than LA infiltration for postoperative analgesia.

The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane block in the pain management of shock wave lithotripsy. / Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal guiado por ecografía en el manejo del dolor de la litotricia por ondas de choque.

OBJECTIVES: We conducted this study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block when used in combination with oral diclofenac administration during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). DESIGN AND SETTING: The study is a retrospective clinical experimental study conducted in a university hospital between January 2017 and January 2018. METHODS: 42 SWL eligible patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 (n: 15) received no medication due to patient's preference. Group 2 (n: 15) received 50 mg oral diclofenac 30 minutes prior to the procedure, and Group 3 (n: 12) received both oral diclofenac and unilateral ultrasound (US) guided TAP block 30 minutes before the procedure. Patient`s characteristics, SWL data and "visual analogue pain scale" (VAS) scores were collected and compared between groups. RESULTS: A total of 44 eligible patients were included in the study. When compared between groups, patient's characteristics including age, body mass index, and SWL data including stone size, SWL number, total energy transmitted and duration of the procedure, were similar and there was no statistical significance. Between groups statistical significance was achieved in only VAS scores. Mean VAS scores in groups 1,2, and 3 were 6.3 ± 1.8, 4.3 ± 2.3, and 1.3 ± 1.0, respectively. No complication was seen in any of the groups. CONCLUSION: Pain relief during SWL operations is still a challenging issue for many clinicians. Our study demonstrates that, among many other anesthetic/analgesic agents and techniques described, unilateral US guided TAP block and diclofenac combination is a feasible option for pain relief during SWL procedures.

OBJECTIVO: Llevamos a cabo un estudio para evaluar la eficacia analgésica del bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal (TAP) guiado por ecografía utilizado en combinación con la administración oral de diclofenaco durante la litotricia extracorporea por ondas de choque (LEOC).MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: Estudio clínico experimental retrospectivo llevado a cabo en un hospital universitario entre Enero de 2017 y Enero del 2018. 42 pacientes sometidos a LEOC fueron incluidos. Se dividieron en tres grupos. Grupo 1 (n=15): No recibió medicación debido a las preferencias del paciente. Grupo 2 (n=15): Recibieron 50 mg de diclofenaco oral 30 minutos antes del procedimiento; y Grupo 3 (n=12): recibieron ambos diclofenaco oral y bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal guiado por ecografía 30 minutos antes del procedimiento. Se recogieron y compararon entre los grupos las características de los pacientes, los datos de la LEOC y las puntuaciones de la escala visual analógica (EVA). RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 44 pacientes en el estudio. En la comparación entre grupos, las características del paciente, incluyendo edad e índice de masa corporal, y los datos de la LEOC, incluyendo tamaño de la litiasis, número de ondas de choque, energía total transmitida y duración del procedimiento, fueron similares y no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas. En la comparación entre grupos, solo la puntuación de la EVA alcanzó significación estadística. Las puntuaciones medias de la EVA fueron 6,3 ± 1,8, 4,3 ± 2,3 y 1,3 ± 1,0, en los grupos 1, 2 y 3 respectivamente. No hubo complicaciones en ninguno de los grupos. CONCLUSIONES: El alivio del dolor durante las intervenciones de LEOC es todavía un desafío para muchos clínicos. Nuestro estudio demuestra que entre otros agentes anestésicos/analgésicos y técnicas descritas, la combinación de bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal (TAP) guiado por ecografía y diclofenaco oral es una opción factible para el alivio del dolor durante la LEOC.

Eficacia analgésica del bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal guiado por ecografía en el manejo del dolor de la litotricia por ondas de choque / The analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane block in the pain management of shock wave lithotripsy

Objectivo: Llevamos a cabo un estudio para evaluar la eficacia analgésica del bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal (TAP) guiado por ecografía utilizado en combinación con la administración oral de diclofenaco durante la litotricia extracorporea por ondas de choque (LEOC). Material y métodos: Estudio clínico experimental retrospectivo llevado a cabo en un hospital universitario entre Enero de 2017 y Enero del 2018. 42 pacientes sometidos a LEOC fueron incluidos. Se dividieron en tres grupos. Grupo 1 (n = 15): No recibió medicación debido a las preferencias del paciente. Grupo 2 (n = 15): Recibieron 50 mg de diclofenaco oral 30 minutos antes del procedimiento; y Grupo 3 (n = 12): recibieron ambos diclofenaco oral y bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal guiado por ecografía 30 minutos antes del procedimiento. Se recogieron y compararon entre los grupos las características de los pacientes, los datos de la LEOC y las puntuaciones de la escala visual analógica (EVA). Resultados: Se incluyeron 44 pacientes en el estudio. En la comparación entre grupos, las características del paciente, incluyendo edad e índice de masa corporal, y los datos de la LEOC, incluyendo tamaño de la litiasis, número de ondas de choque, energía total transmitida y duración del procedimiento, fueron similares y no hubo diferencias estadísticamente significativas. En la comparación entre grupos, solo la puntuación de la EVA alcanzó significación estadística. Las puntuaciones medias de la EVA fueron 6,3 ± 1,8, 4,3 ± 2,3 y 1,3 ± 1,0, en los grupos 1, 2 y 3 respectivamente. No hubo complicaciones en ninguno de los grupos. Conclusiones: El alivio del dolor durante las intervenciones de LEOC es todavía un desafío para muchos clínicos. Nuestro estudio demuestra que entre otros agentes anestésicos/analgésicos y técnicas descritas, la combinación de bloqueo unilateral del plano del musculo transverso abdominal (TAP) guiado por ecografía y diclofenaco oral es una opción factible para el alivio del dolor durante la LEOC

Objectives: We conducted this study to evaluate the analgesic efficacy of ultrasound guided unilateral transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block when used in combination with oral diclofenac administration during extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (SWL). Design and setting: The study is a retrospective clinical experimental study conducted in a university hospital between January 2017 and January 2018. METHODS: 42 SWL eligible patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 (n: 15) received no medication due to patient’s preference. Group 2 (n: 15) received 50 mg oral diclofenac 30 minutes prior to the procedure, and Group 3 (n: 12) received both oral diclofenac and unilateral ultrasound (US) guided TAP block 30 minutes before the procedure. Patient`s characteristics, SWL data and "visual analogue pain scale" (VAS) scores were collected and compared between groups. Results: A total of 44 eligible patients were included in the study. When compared between groups, patient's characteristics including age, body mass index, and SWL data including stone size, SWL number, total energy transmitted and duration of the procedure, were similar and there was no statistical significance. Between groups statistical significance was achieved in only VAS scores. Mean VAS scores in groups 1,2, and 3 were 6,3 ± 1,8, 4,3 ± 2,3 y 1,3 ± 1,0, respectively. No complication was seen in any of the groups. Conclusion: Pain relief during SWL operations is still a challenging issue for many clinicians. Our study demonstrates that, among many other anesthetic/analgesic agents and techniques described, unilateral US guided TAP block and diclofenac combination is a feasible option for pain relief during SWL procedures

Evaluating treatment modalities in chronic pain treatment by the multi-criteria decision making procedure.

BACKGROUND: Chronic pain is one of the most common complaints of cancer patients. There are many pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment modalities used for the treatment of pain. Nonetheless, non-pharmacological interventions are preferred because of potential side effects in cases resistant to medical therapy that require a dose increase or potent drug use. In most real-life situations, the decision on which technique to choose is based on the clinical but subjective decisions of the practitioners. This study aimed to find out the best non-pharmacological treatment option for patients with chronic cancer pain by following a rational and reasonable approach. METHODS: Since the evaluation of treatment options requires to make a comparison between a number of alternatives in the light of certain criteria, we utilize the order relation analysis (G1-method) which is a method for determining the weights based on the improved Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). The method uses the relative importances on prioritizing the four criteria and eight sub-criteria defined by the experts of three pain physicians, one oncologist, and one oncologic surgeon. Four alternatives are then compared according to the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) using the verbal subjective judgments of the practitioners. RESULTS: Obtained results indicate that the general medical condition of the patient and the stage of the cancer are the essential factors in the selection of the treatment method. It is followed by the extent of the pain and the level of evidence, respectively. According to the evaluations performed, spinal port and splanchnic nerve radiofrequency thermocoagulation treatments are the first and second priority methods for pain treatment, respectively, compared to lumbar epidural catheter and celiac plexus block. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study emphasize the need to integrate critical criteria into the decision-making process objectively. This is the first study in which multi-criteria decision-making tools are used in the evaluation and selection of pain management methods in cancer patients.

Comparison of block and pulsed radiofrequency of the ganglion impar in coccygodynia

Background/aim: Ganglion impar blockis used for the treatment of chronic coccygodynia. Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the ganglion impar is a promising novel technique. The aim of this study was to determine and compare the efficacy of the blockade and PRF of the ganglion impar. Materials and methods: Thirty-nine consecutive patients diagnosed with coccygodynia and treated with a blockade or PRF of the ganglion impar were included in this retrospective study. We compared the ganglion impar block (GIB) group (n = 25) with the ganglion impar pulsed radiofrequency (GIPRF) group (n = 14) in terms of pain intensity and patient satisfaction. We applied a numeric pain rating scale (NPRS) and a Likert scale (LS). Results: The NPRS scores in both groups had improved significantly from baseline at 3 weeks and at 3 and 6 months. However, in the sixth month, pain levels in the GIPRF group remained good, but they had returned to almost initial levels in the GIB group. Correspondingly, there were significant differences between groups in NPRS and patient satisfaction scores at 6 months (P ˂ 0.05). Conclusion: PRF neuromodulation provides significantly longer pain relief and reduces the risk of recurrence of pain in chronic coccygodynia as compared with blockade of the impar ganglion.

A Novel Technique: Ultrasound-Guided Serratus Anterior Plane Block for the Treatment of Posttraumatic Intercostal Neuralgia.

Serratus anterior plane block has been used for pain management during the acute period of conditions affecting the thorax, such as postthoracotomy recovery, rib fracture, and breast surgery recovery. Here, we report the use of serratus anterior plane block in posttraumatic chronic pain treatment. We describe a case of posttraumatic chronic intercostal neuralgia, in which successful pain relief was achieved via repeated injections of local anesthetic and steroid combinations in the serratus anterior plane under ultrasonographic guidance. This novel technique is easy to administer, reliable, and warrants further investigation with regard to its use for rehabilitation of patients who are experiencing posttraumatic chronic neuropathies of the chest wall.

Ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency neuromodulation of the suprascapular nerve in partial rotator cuff tears

Background/Aim: Pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) of the suprascapular nerve has been shown to be effective in the treatment of chronic shoulder pain. Ultrasound (US) guidance has gained popularity in regional blocks recently. This study aims to investigate the efficacy of suprascapular nerve pulsed radiofrequency under the guidance of ultrasonography. Materials and methods: This retrospective study included patients treated with PRF of the suprascapular nerve with a diagnosis of partial rotator cuff tears. The patients were assessed with a numeric rating scale (NRS), the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI), and a Likert patient satisfaction score before the treatment and 3 weeks and 6 months following the treatment. Results: A total of 31 patients was included in the study. The patients' mean age was 66.8 ± 13.3 years. The mean scores of the NRS, SPADI, and Likert scale before the procedure (7.32 ± 1.1, 69.0 ± 8.5, 1.6 ± 0.6) and at 3 weeks (2.9 ± 2.1, 32.1 ± 17.20, 4 ± 1.2) and 6 months (3.2 ± 2.6, 33.9 ± 20.8, 3.8 ± 1.2) after the procedure were evaluated. We observed significant improvement in NRS, SPADI, and Likert scores at 3 weeks and 6 months following the treatment (P < 0.001). Conclusion: The study demonstrated that US-guided suprascapular nerve PRF achieves good pain relief and functional improvement in patients with partial rotator cuff tears for at least 6 months.

The Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Pulsed Radiofrequency of Genicular Nerves in the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Severe Degenerative Disease or Previous Total Knee Arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND Pulsed radiofrequency of genicular nerves in the management of osteoarthritis related chronic knee pain has recently become a promising treatment. Ultrasonography has replaced fluoroscopic guidance in pain medicine. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of ultrasound-guided genicular pulsed radiofrequency on knee pain and function in patients who had severe knee osteoarthritis or who had previous knee arthroplasty. MATERIAL AND METHODS The retrospective study included a total of 23 patients with chronic knee pain, of which 17 patients were included in Group I (non-operated), and 6 patients were included in Group II (post-arthroplasty). Treatment was based on ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of the superior medial, superior lateral, and inferior medial genicular nerves. The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) scores were assessed before treatment, and at 3 weeks and at 3 months following the procedure. RESULTS Pulsed radiofrequency of the genicular nerves significantly reduced perceived pain and disability in the majority of the patients. The proportion of the patients with improvement of ≥50% in pretreatment VAS scores at 3 weeks and 3 months following treatment were 14 out of 17 patients (82%) and 15 out of 17 patients (88%) in Group 1, and 4 out of 6 patients (67%), 4 out of 6 patients (67%) in Group 2, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Our study results suggest that ultrasound-guided pulsed radiofrequency of genicular nerves is a safe and minimally invasive procedure that significantly alleviates pain and disability in patients with severe degenerative disease or with previous knee arthroplasty.

Pelvic Incidence as a Prognostic Factor in Coccydynia.

AIM: To evaluate the pelvic incidence (PI) of coccydynia patients treated by different methods and to determine whether it is a risk factor or a prognostic factor. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients who were treated for coccydynia were evaluated retrospectively, and 110 patients were enrolled. Spinopelvic parameters were measured by using Surgimap software, and the position of the coccyx was evaluated according to the Postacchini classification. The results were compared to spinopelvic parameters of healthy population. RESULTS: The mean PI of the coccydynia patients did not differ from the healthy population, and there were no differences between treatment subgroups. The Postacchini classification showed that patients with type-3 and type-4 configurations had higher PI. When treatment groups were evaluated according to Postacchini classification, 80% of the surgery group had type-3 and type-4 configurations (50%, 30% respectively). CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the PI of coccydynia patients. Patients with higher PI were prone to having type-3 of type-4 coccyx configurations and undergoing surgical treatment.

Morphological Description and Clinical Implication of Sphenopalatine Foramen for Accurate Transnasal Sphenopalatine Ganglion Block: An Anatomical Study.

OBJECTIVE: Transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block is a commonly used approach for treatment of a variety of headache disorders. However, no standard technique has yet been defined for this less invasive approach. In this study, our aim was to investigate morphometric and anatomical features of the sphenopalatine foramen, and to describe a more efficient approach for transnasal sphenopalatine ganglion block. METHOD: The present study was designed retrospectively. Ten cadaver semi- heads and 18 adult dry skulls (28 samples totally) were included in the study. The distances between the sphenopalatine foramen and palatum durum, and also between the sphenopalatine foramen and the spina nasalis anterior, angle of elevation of the sphenopalatine foramen from palatum durum, and the length and width of the sphenopalatine foramen were measured. RESULTS: The mean width and length of the foramen were 3.79±0.35 and 6.44±0.94 mm, respectively. The mean distance between the palatum durum and the sphenopalatine foramen was 15.58±1.68 mm. The mean angle of elevation of the sphenopalatine foramen from the palatum durum was 26.10±3.97 degrees. The mean distance between the sphenopalatine foramen and the anterior nasal spine was 52.90±2.98 mm. CONCLUSIONS: In the transnasal sphenopalatine block, we suggest advancement of nasal applicator through superolateral direction for approximately 5.3 cm, and at an angle of about 26° from the nasal base..